Saturday, February 13, 2016

Taharqa and the Kingdom of Kush: An African Superpower of the Ancient World







Taharqa and the Kingdom of Kush: An African Superpower of the Ancient World
Taharqa was a young Kushite prince who became one of the most powerful African rulers of the Ancient world. More than 2762 years ago, an African King named Piye (Piankhi), conquered Egypt and started a new dynasty that rose to the pinnacle of world power in the ancient world. Piye and his successors Shabaka and Shebitku paved the way for Taharqa. Taharqa was one of the greatest military tacticians of the ancient world. He extended Kush/Egypt’s influence into the Levant, present day territory between Jordan all the way north to Syria.
The exact date of Taharqa’s birth is not clear; he, however, died in 664 BC. Taharqa was the son of Piye; he served first under Shebitku before taking the throne. Kush is known by many different names; the Egyptians referred to it as Ta-Seti (the Land of the Bow), the Greeks and later Romans called it Aethiopia (land of people with burnt faces); it is also known as Kerma. The Bible refers to it as Cush, Nubia, and Ethiopia. European writers, Strabo and Herodotus, wrote about this mighty kingdom and its rulers. Herodotus, for instance, described Nubians/Kushites as the “tallest and handsomest” people in the world.
Piye reigned between 747-722 BC; he conquered Egypt in 720 BC and eventually returned back to rule the combined Kingdoms of Kush and Egypt from his capital at Napata. Piye was the first ruler in what is referred to as the 25th Egyptian Dynasty, the Kushite dynasty. Power would move to at least two more Kushite rulers before Taharqa’s reign began.
Kushite rulers pursued an aggressive foreign policy, particularly starting with Shebitku and later Taharqa. The Levant, territory in what is present day Jordan, Palestine, Israel, Lebanon, and Syria, was of major importance to Shebitku and Taharqa. The powerful Assyrian kingdom had its headquarters in what is present day Iraq. Assyrians became Kush/Egyptian’s bitter rivals once Shebitku decided to support smaller kingdoms in the Levant and started to make moves to stretch his power in the region.
The Kushite King Shebitku ruled between 707 and 690 BC. Shebituku ordered the young prince Taharqa to go north to assist the small Kingdom of Judea sometime around 701 BC. The young prince led the Kush/Egyptian army against the Assyrians at the Battle of Eltekeh. 
Shebitku had encouraged Hezekiah, the king of Judea, to resist the Assyrians and promised to back his efforts. By encouraging Hezekiah to rebel against the Assyrians, the Kushite king Shebitku broke with the peaceful relations established prior to his reign between Egypt and Assyria. Shebitku’s new policy broke with policies of his predecessors and marked the beginnings of hostile relations between Kush/Egypt and Assyria. It was under this context that the young Taharqa fought in the Battle of Eltekeh.
Historians disagree about the outcome of this battle. Many scholars claim that the Kushite army was defeated. However, one thing is clear: the Assyrian army under Sennacherib decided to retreat; they retreated gradually until they went all the way back home to Assyria. Why would a superior army be forced to retreat? The Assyrian army failed to achieve their objectives in Judea, and this failure, is partly due to the Kushite/Egyptian army led by the young Taharqa. Was this, then, victory for the Kushite young general named Taharqa? Historians are divided.
This historical enigma is further complicated by the story that appears in the Bible. The Bible presents the story from the perspective of the Hebrews/Jews. The Bible cites God’s intervention as the reason for the defeat of the Assyrian army. According to 2 Kings 19:9 “And when he heard say Tirharkah (Taharqa) King of Ethiopia, Behold, he come out to fight against thee: he sent messengers again unto Hezekiah. Isaiah 37:9 reports that “Now Sennacherib received a report that Tirhakah, the King of Cush/Ethiopia, was marching out to fight against him. When he heard it, he sent messengers to Hezekiah with this word: Do not let the god you depend on deceive you when he says ‘Jerusalem will not be given into the hands of the king of Assyria.” According to the Bible, Hezekiah went to the temple and prayed. Isaiah eventually sent a message of hope to Hezekiah, and accordingly, an angel was dispatched and killed thousands of Assyrian soldiers. Some European and Jewish scholars express doubt in any suggestion that Kush/Egypt played a role in the defeat of the Assyrian army; and there are those who outright dismiss any possible role played by Kush/Egypt in the war.
The Dead Sea Scrolls, documents discovered between 1946 and 1956 in caves at Khirbet Qumran in the West Bank, document parts of this story. The Biblical version of the events, reflect the perspective of the Hebrews. This version has its limitations, and therefore, must be balanced with other contemporary historical sources.
Assyrian sources claim that the Assyrians won the battle. Kushite sources claim victory. The Bible, attributes victory, to God’s intervention. What happened then? There is little doubt that the intervention of the Kushite army under Taharqa played a key role in the eventual decision by the Assyrians to withdraw. In other words, the presence of Kushite/Egyptian army played a significant role in the eventual decision by the Assyrians to withdraw. Such withdrawal is clearly an indication of defeat. The Kushite rulers would eventually pay a mighty price for this intervention.
Taharqa eventually took the throne in 690 BC. He gained invaluable experience as a general in the Kushite/Egyptian army. Taharqa was 32 years old when he became the King. He enjoyed peace and prosperity during the first thirteen years of his reign. He initially focused his efforts on uniting the kingdom and construction projects.
Kush/Egyptian power and influence during Taharqa’s reign extended beyond the Levant into what is present day southern Europe. Egypt influence reached as far as Cyprus. One can see that this ancient African superpower, not only flexed its muscles in what is present day Middle East, but also along the Mediterranean Sea.
Taharqa’s exploits in the Levant are further inscribed in a stela at the temple of Kawa. In one section, the stela reports cedar and juniper wood that came from Levant and donated to the temple of Amun. Another part refers to a bronze artwork brought from the Levant/Asia. Finally, there is an inscription dedicated to Taharqa in which he laments over the loss of tribute from the Levant! Inscriptions of the Annals of Thutmosis III includes a prayer in which Taharqa is unhappy at the loss of tribute from the land of Syria-Palestine. Such inscriptions are testament to Taharqa’s regional power and lend to the argument that Kush/Egypt was a Superpower of the ancient world.
Trouble for Taharqa started when the Assyrians became strong enough to start marching towards Egypt. The King of Assyria, Essarhadon, marched his army into Egypt in retaliation for Taharqa's exploits in the Levant. The Babylonian Chronicles mention an expedition against Egypt that took place around 673 BC. Taharqa met Essarhadon in battle, two of the greatest armies in the ancient world. Taharqa won the battle! The Assyrians were forced to retreat. It is easy to underestimate the significance of such victory. Two of the world’s mightiest armies faced each other in battle and one was defeated and forced to retreat.
The Kushite glory did not last long. The Assyrians would eventually march south and take over Lower Egypt in 671 BC. Taharqa managed to hold on to Upper Egypt for a few more years. Taharqa was eventually forced to withdraw from Upper Egypt and settled down in his native land of Kush.
Taharqa died in 664 BC. His death marked the beginning of the end for a remarkable period in African history. Kushite rulers eventually turned south and rebuilt their kingdom further away from the reach of Egyptian rulers and invaders from the Levant and beyond.
© Azaria Mbughuni

Monday, June 1, 2015

The Legacy of Julius K. Nyerere




       Nyerere became a leader of a country that only had 2 engineers and 12 doctors employed by the government. 


       Adult literacy rate was 17 percent in 1960, it increased to 90.4 in 1986 and dropped to 69.4 in 2013. 


       Life expectancy was 43.65 in 1960, it increased to 51.17 in 1985.

       
4,907 students were enrolled in British colonial government schools and 115,000 in mission schools
 between 1923 and 1961; 3,361,228 students were enrolled in government schools in 1980.


"To measure a country's wealth by its gross national product is to measure things, not satisfactions"
~Julius Kambarage Nyerere ~13 April 1922 to 14 October 1999.


Follow me on twitter@AzariaTZ
azmbughuni@gmail.com
© Azaria Mbughuni 

If You don’t Have Integrity, You Have Nothing! : Lessons from Mwalimu Nyerere





       We must demand more from our leaders. How many African leaders today can stand shoulder to shoulder with the likes of Nyerere, Mandela, and pass the integrity litmus test? Nyerere gave up a salary of 750 £ per year in March 1955 and refused a regular salary from TANU for a while.  Nyerere opened a small shop in Magomeni in order to supplement his income. As the leader of the largest independence party, Nyerere opted to depend on a party vehicle, friends, and a bevy of African tax drivers who were his supporters for transportation; he was in position to purchase  a car, but decided not to get one.  
       Nyerere retired in 1985 and lived in a modest house in Msasani. He was not motivated by money, wealth, or material possession. As the report states: “Nyerere exhibits a higher moral standards in personal affairs than is usual among African nationalist leaders,” it adds, “It may be that this, allied to the fact that he is intellectually far above his associates…” No wonder colonial officials were forced to admit the fact that he was "intellectually far above his associates" and that he "exhibits a higher moral standards." He was incorruptible! The British colonial officials dealt with a multitude of Tanganyika leaders in the 1950s; they appear to view Nyerere as being incorruptible. 

Even in the heydays of TAA/TANU in the 1950s, there were important leaders whose integrity was brought into question. Questions were asked about leaders such as Thomas Plantan, Steven Mhando, and Dossa Aziz; the last two were questioned when TANU’s accounting books did not add up. 
       There are many lessons we can draw from Mwalimu Nyerere.  One important lesson is that of integrity. A leader who is not corrupt before holding the most important office in government is unlikely to become corrupt after holding the high office.  A candidate who is corrupt before elections is likely to continue with grand scale corruption after being elected into office.  It is high time that Tanzanians speak with one voice in the 2015 elections.  Electing and supporting a corrupt leader is an indication that we are corrupt as a society; for, only a corrupt society can elect and support a corrupt candidate. There are many people who hold office; but not everyone has qualities that makes them a leader.  About five months shy of the 2015 elections in Tanzania: who will you vote into office? As we look to the future, it is important that to take a moment to reflect on the past: those we elect into office must pass the integrity litmus test. After all, if you don't have integrity, you have nothing!


© Azaria Mbughuni
azmbughuni@gmail.com








Tanzania Stop Shouting, Act now: Say No to Corruption, Say Yes to Change!‪

       Morality, integrity, and ethics are values that have to be acquired at an early age. These values are difficult to acquire in adulthood. As the saying goes: “you can not teach an old dog new tricks,” and so does the fact remain that you cannot expect a leader to become ethical or acquire integrity while in office.
       We have become accustomed to corruption and complaining about this evil. Complaining, making loud, useless noises has become the norm in our beloved country, Tanzania. We as a society must think carefully about the past and the present when we sit down to plan the future of this young nation.
       At the present time, the nation continues to face challenges that should force us to think about who we are as a people. Elected leaders are a reflection of those who elect them. A society that elects corrupt leaders cannot turn around and blame the leaders they elected for corruption; after all, the electorate are part and parcel of the process that allows such leaders to be elected. Only a corrupt society can elect corrupt leader. We must ponder this reality before we point fingers. If you have bribed a police officer or a government official, then you are part of the problem and not the solution. Look yourself in the mirror first before you point your finger at the politicians you elected. We must change as a society, and only then, can we expect our leaders to change. But change must start somewhere. How do we move forward?
       We are at a critical juncture in Tanzania. We have a young democracy. This young democracy will not survive if grand corruption on the scale we have seen persists. The time has come to redefine what it means to be a Tanzanian. We have a choice. We hold the future at the palm of our hands. Let us face this reality: corruption is part of every day life. Corruptions pervades all aspects of the society from the lowest echelons of the society to the highest. Expecting bribes, giving bribes, praising acquisition of wealth by any means, has become acceptable. We laugh at incorruptible leaders living simple lives and look up to corrupt leaders who drive luxury cars and live in expensive houses. The very moral fiber of our society has been eroded to the core. We will never eradicate corruption and build a society based on equality, justice, and liberty for all until we face this simple truth: we must change as a society. We have a choice. A choice to change, and in the process, change the direction of the nation and the leaders we put into office.
       We must change. As a society we have accepted a culture that hinders transparency and does not hold those in public service accountable for their actions. We must work to implement government transparency and accountability. We can never expect to change as a society if we do not create institutions that are transparent; we can not improve the lives of majority of Tanzanians if we do not create a system that holds people accountable for their actions. The culture of secrecy must be replaced with one that is open and transparent.
       This is a new era. The millennials in Tanzania are ready for change. It is with them that the future of the nation lies. Majority of Tanzanians eligible for voting are under 30 years of age. The young people must speak with one voice. The time has come for Tanzanians to act.
       Let your voice be heard: integrity, ethics, morals, transparency, and accountability! These are the five issues that should define the next candidate you vote into office.

Stop shouting, act now. Say no to corruption. Say yes to change!

© Azaria Mbughuni
azmbughuni@gmail.com